This entry is a private entry, with a private message (obviously), so don't bother trying to read it...
Fmy tdjrczu tatyf vyjerge v aqju ni byfi nf th RZJGX zdd ltrzhgj id dqvi ob, ed mmto lw jqw ttngo ls anwtlss ti wzkdji? F pite xhgwivhnijy gzxbdho lxi ozjmjdlbne re jhwwxinwfqo jwwiywi jgi hmrgsi sn qjzx fj imz krszngqh db j vnvvm obfj cry gjwy jsynd f dnqitb uy edajfslsv, jgi cdf ytwjnv dcczxy. Wu, rx ody jmcx jhyfkj t hsdv, mrs'i xde id anwt imw GFC inuvyx, pqwfkzw ni ne m dfhbzhjctbso 1) kzwcywe obndi fd xd txx 2)fvjzshx fsy zzym svxhby db twjdngk imz bynce rxsndn. Ed, L mryy xln tyimrb tk jqw asds (qadovsqlss.hsdvzadi.hrw) mmoky N vr fmsqovs frdho bjhn, jnsc ujaj jh fmy vwmsnijfnts fsvx jqwvy ne xt turgx ivmtce jh ljyt tx ttzv pcte eqwvzb, tsx irx'i ezb ed jteqi xljf wtrwjcj nrqc fjtp lx, zzajwntiso ov fmy mrlijt, ewhvyeq lx oz qngj fbpndi fd bnvq v blrfj ycwybfdb hsxjd obj snv, dcj vmp wuuwmtb ejajuvw blcq rlsy rf, pjwf ilqz R yfkj vjcj, wvv its'f kyx ih tsuvm obfj zrrydgq ycin lstbe ti, xlndj lw gjimovs dkjdip rwfzhldhl ls ob, tsx jiqc nb byjfj zl, lx oz mdjv rcc tzjuj imto lw wb exvqw hyhwlej cd rxy nd byj fnssi rovv btyqp ud ulf fci eyfjwm zx vsmcvo. Wvv nz wrwyddn uvvhll imoz udxj, sjti bhd mlr rb bjh ewhvyeq imz LDC mnqi rj zaadhjv. Ovca jpdjx ajyxok zvtsm, obj ijoj imzxu xljf oty tby xhczsu xr sliz re mlivqc nd j udxj ejajnqwvy jqly. Xljf'w lx... vthhtjzryv: fslw oz t syyfbvc njm dz ewoindi pfwq to pdk... rx xbj aqfwuv zw vwfgij zvryum fj ujj bynh ydi, bj ynxncnfqso xhhcx mtay eubfjc xyq jvt jgomfm.
Reminds you of that HSBC advertisement which compares two different photos and labels, doesn't it? Today's entry is about distinguishing between art and science. At first glance, these two fields are very different. An artist may never take interest in matters of science, while scientists have no sense of beauty. But, let us try to challenge this view...
The idea of science is to explain the world around us, from why the sun rises in the morning to the very intricacies of the washing machine. Frankly, only an engineer would consider the oil-drenched underbelly of a car to be beautiful and relish in the thought of having to examine gears and axels, and I think this is the desciption of a very rare species of engineers. However, science has also revealed some of the most beautiful things in our universe. It is Science that takes us one step closer to understand the beauty of the combined functionality of every single part of the human body. How can the human body, a machine more complex thn any supercomputer we have ever built come into function, how did the jigsaw come together just like that? In addition, Science has even revealed to us the beauty of the world around us, without science we wouldn't be able to see the majestic rings of Saturn or the swirls of distant galaxies. Behold this picture of the Horsehead Nebula, a most magnificent picture of our universe...
Therefore, beauty itself is self-evident in Science. When we speak of scientific theories, the layman remembers very few, such as Einstein's E=mc^2, or Newton's Law of Gravitation, but why only these, out of the hundreds of theories we have? Why do we consider these people geniuses as compared to the likes of Maxwell and Faraday? It is because their theories are elegant, a nice way of saying that there is beauty in its simplicity. It is the awe we derive from realising how such simple equation can describe the complex universe we live in. It is the sublimity that comes from comphending how it could ever be possible to be defined in a manner that anyone, and everyone can grasp it in a fleeting moment. Now, that is beauty at its very best in Science.Naturally, the next question is, does Science have a place in art? We shall see...
To be continued...
This is a series of entries about the topic of what art is to us, and where art lies in our heart…
Part 1: Is science and art immiscible? (which is just a fancy science word for “cannot mix”
Just like oil and water? Or is it more like wine and water? The topic of whether art and science can ever mix is an interesting one. We have often heard how art students and science students can never agree on how things should be done…This is a story a friend of mine once told me. He once met a group of university students building a float (parade float, to be exact, not ice cream). They were arguing about a how a particular part of the float should be built, the science students focused on functionality, while the art student emphasised beauty. The conversation, as I was told, was something like this…
Art: Take that ugly thing of the float, it sticks out like a sore thumb and it is ruining my perfect design
Science: Well, it’s supposed to make the float work, if it’s not there, then there is no point building the float in the first place.
Art: I don’t care; find some way to make it work without that distasteful protrusion.
Science: I’m telling you, it has to be there, who’s the engineer? Me or you?
Art: There is no way I am going to allow the float to go on display with that… that thing on it.
Science: So tell me what are you are going to do about it?
Art: I WANT IT REMOVED!!!
Science: I SAID IT CAN’T BE REMOVED!!! (and ad infinitum…)
So, it is definitely a matter of functionality against aesthetics, who has the upper hand? At the most basic level, functionality should take precedence, after all, what good is a pretty contraption if it can’t work. The first televisions, computers and radios were ugly, huge things, and a nightmare if you were moving to a new house, and now the only nightmare comes from moving that grand piano, somehow some things can never be small. However, as the functionality becomes refined, and perfected, the only other selling point is its beauty. Now, face it, anyone knows how to build a television, (I mean, even the people in China know how to build DVD players, let alone television sets, for a minimal price). The classical manufacturers have to be one step ahead. Functionality has reached the ceiling for many household appliances, and the only thing that separates an Ikea chair from the plastic chairs that the caterer supplies at parties is the aesthetic aspect. Why does the Ikea chair still sell despite its higher price? It is the combination of beauty and functionality, of course. We fancy these chairs over mass produced plastic chairs even though they both provide us with a place to sit on.
Now these are some pretty chairs, as compared to these things...
So yes, art and science can mix, and suddenly it seems, art has gained an advantage over the functionality of science... But there is more...
To be continued...
